h4831sc Fundamentals Explained

h4831sc Fundamentals Explained

Blog Article

Considering the fact that there isn't going to look like any "official" Load Data on the market for this Load, can a number of you provide a starting point with this combination and factors to consider when Performing this Load up?

They are really the identical issue, but H4831 sc is Slash shorter so it is going to pack right into a circumstance a lot easier then the traditional, and in some cases like our 7mm rem mag it permits us to add much more powder then just the normal H4831.

You might be suitable They may be the same the SC is brief cut so it meters greater, I do not Feel you can find just regular 4831 any longer

That means the knowledgable handloader can, with some extrapolation, locate a setting up load when just one is outlined for a particular cartridge.

INgunner54 reported: It's been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Located a node and shot some groups.

I realize, tough instances. H4831SC will definitely do the job, I just didn't like the case density when loaded extended. I do not keep in mind powder demand off the highest of my head but I had been launching a Berger 168gr VLD at 3,000fps which can be exactly where I typically intention for being. In your circumstance making use of what you've got (and what I should have performed) I'd get started with the tip of the bearing floor from the bullet ideal at the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there as you look for a velocity node.

i've utilised both equally and made use of the very same rates and also have not been capable to h4831sc load data notify any noticable discrepancies with overall performance. the SC version meters a bit smoother is about all. any remarks??

and you may want to spend money on some new load data textbooks. powder composition and chemistry can does modify over the years. 4831 powder of yrs ago isn't similar as what is currently available. that is definitely why a person serious about reloading safely can have by far the most current load data books to make reference to.

I've observed the exact opposite being true in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with one hundred eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker and Similarly correct powder in my 300 Get Mag.

locutus reported: I however have an excellent stockpile of H450, the ball powder equal of 4831, which flows by way of my powder measures easily.

So happy your getting much more sorts of powder back again in. Now you might want to get primers again in stock and reloaded can begin reloading all over again.. just saying

Right after studying this short h4831sc load data article (and many Many others, but this just one is considered the most data pushed with many accredited shooters) I've stopped stressing about touching or staying in a magical distance with the lands, and commenced loading in which I could optimize many facets of a load. Just my .02, hopefully you can obtain anything to work for ya.

Although IMR 4831 and H4831SC are unique powders, you will discover that in several circumstances, where by one of them is shown one other will likely be in addition. Also, you'll find there is a fairly reliable partnership amongst them with regard to outlined loads.

This looks like a good spot to disclose a little more details on Hodgdon, H4831 specifically...I after experienced a pound of H4831SC sit within h4831 vs h4831sc the shelf for many many years. It had been purchased just before Hodgdon commenced publicizing the "Extreme" line of powders, of which the H4831s are a component.